Ketanji Jackson doubles down on her leftist political agenda for Supreme Court

Part of liberal minority, she complains that President Trump is winning cases

Ketanji Jackson, Joe Biden’s lone appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court, made absolutely clear her political and ideological agenda for the highest court in the nation during her confirmation hearing before the U.S. Senate. And now she’s doubling down.

At her hearing she refused, or was not sufficiently able, to define “woman.”

She was asked by Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., a woman, to define the term.

Jackson’s response: “I can’t.”

A surprised Blackburn said, “You can’t?” And Jackson said, “Not in this context. I’m not a biologist.”

Blackburn noted, “The meaning of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can’t give me a definition?”

Of course, under Biden’s tenure in the White House, a primary goal for the executive branch was to promote and sponsor transgenderism, a social-political movement that defies science by claiming an impossibility, that a man can become a woman or vice versa.

Under that ideology, a man who says he is a woman, becomes a woman.

Blackburn warned, “The fact that you can’t give me a straight answer about something as fundamental as what a woman is underscores the dangers of the kind of progressive education that we are hearing about.”

Now, on the Supreme Court, Jackson has doubled down on her politics, most recently in a confrontation with Justice Brett Kavanaugh this week.

Jackson complained, during an annual lecture honoring a late Washington judge, that the president won cases on the high court’s shadow docket. That’s when cases are handled on an emergency basis, without the benefit of trials, hearings and appellate rulings.

According to a report at Fox News, Jackson complained, “The administration is making new policy … and then insisting the new policy take effect immediately, before the challenge is decided. This uptick in the court’s willingness to get involved in cases on the emergency docket is a real unfortunate problem. It’s not serving the court or this country well.”

She also said it was a “problem” that Trump could win cases at the court.

Actually, Kavanaugh, a Trump appointee, explained that the court is handling emergency cases the same way it always has, but there were more requests now, and it is a fact that a multitude of district court judges have ruled against Trump’s agenda, many times in ways, like using nationwide injunctions, that are beyond their authority.

And President Trump is using more executive orders because Congress is passing less legislation, he explained.

In August she blasted other justices on the court for “lawmaking” from the bench.

When she was on the losing side of a decision, she said, “This is Calvinball jurisprudence with a twist. Calvinball has only one rule: There are no fixed rules. We seem to have two: that one, and this Administration always wins.”

Fox reported, “The Trump administration has faced hundreds of lawsuits and adverse rulings in the lower courts, and the Department of Justice’s solicitor general’s office, which represents the government before the Supreme Court, often does not elevate cases to that level.”

The report said the Trump administration has brought about 30 emergency applications to the Supreme Court and secured victories about 80% of the time.