‘F*** him to his face’: Congresswoman launches ‘deranged psycho’ F-bomb spree as Trump attends Supreme Court on birthright citizenship
‘What truly stands out is how remarkably retarded you sounded while attempting it. If one is going to employ vulgarity in public discourse, it demands conviction, precision, and a measure of skill’
A Democrat congresswoman is coming under fire after posting – and then deleting – a profanity-packed rant against President Donald Trump as he attended U.S. Supreme Court arguments Wednesday on birthright citizenship.
It was U.S. Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nev., who shared an Associated Press story about Trump’s presence at the high court, along with her own comment stating: “”So f***ing f***ed up. I’ll pray they f*** him to his face. Sorry, I say f*** a lot these days.”
“WTH? Mentally deranged psycho!” exclaimed Eric Daugherty of RightLine News.
After deleting her remark, she posted a follow-up message, indicating: “Clearly my language touched a nerve – my nerve was touched by the attacks on our Constitution and its separation of powers. I took an oath to protect and defend it.”
Responses to Lee’s follow-up message include:
“If you’re so proud of it, why did you delete it?”
“You realize that your language incites political violence. Right? As a leader you need to lower the temperature in America not raise it. There is nothing wrong with a president attending a hearing in the Supreme Court.”
“I’m gonna need you to take an oath to stop swearing until you get good at it.”
“Currently you sound like a 9-year-old trying to impress the older kids.”
“Just another filthy mouth liberal disgusting.”
“Clearly you shouldn’t be representing the great citizens of our country if you can’t control your emotions. And being this crude? ”
“Susie is the perfect example why she shouldn’t be in gov’t, not only do her emotions override judgement, she’s vile.”
“Susie Lee, you’re like a movie whose script consists of endless f*ck-bombs … which is indicative of the script writers having lack of talent and intelligence to compose any dialogue of value.”
“Rep. Lee, I have absolutely no objection to the use of strong language. What truly stands out, however, is how remarkably retarded you sounded while attempting it. If one is going to employ vulgarity in public discourse, it demands conviction, precision, and a measure of skill. None of which were evident in your delivery. That tepid, fumbling effort did little but undermine your point. We who strive for higher standards of communication and professionalism can surely do far better than such an ineffective display. Do better.”
