Breaking… Durham Appendix: Clinton Supporters in FBI Lacked “Conclusive Irrefutable Evidence” of Russia’s Involvement of DNC Email Scandal — And Lisa Page Knew This!
Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) released the Durham investigation appendix on Thursday morning.
The appendix provides further truth on the Clinton Campaign’s plan to tie Trump to Russia and the FBI’s failure to investigate.
The information released on Thursday contains previously classified information exposing a reported Clinton campaign plan to falsely tie President Donald Trump to Russia.
The appendix also includes information that Clinton supporters in the FBI (a majority of the top brass officials) lacked “conclusive irrefutable evidence” of Russia’s involvement of the DNC email scandal.
According to the Durham annex:
Clinton’s supporters in the FBI lack conclusive irrefutable evidence of the Russian Federation’s involvement in the scandal, tied to the theft of the DNC’s correspondence. In the meantime, during the launched investigation, there has been a multitude of circumstantial evidence that the alias of Guccifer 2.0 (the name of the hacker who accepted responsibility for the incident) was in fact used to cover up a special unit of the GRU of the Russian Federation Defense Ministry’s general staff.
This comes from page 7 of the report that was released today.
So, once again, we discover the FBI had ZERO evidence that Russia hacked the DNC server or hacked the election.
This brings us back to the previous reports where we reported on the non-existent evidence that Russia hacked the DNC servers and spoiled the 2016 election.
In fact we reported this earlier today…
Barack Obama, James Comey, James Clapper, John Brennan, and every major mainstream media outlet lied for years to the American public by claiming “Russia hacked the election” to get President Trump elected in 2016.
They all knew this was a lie.
These liars all pushed the line that Crowdstrike had evidence that the DNC was hacked by Russia.
But that was not true.
We knew this was a lie from the beginning.
And we were absolutely correct.
Crowdstrike had absolutely no evidence that Russia hacked the DNC and then forwarded hacked emails to WikiLeaks. And they kept this to themselves.
A release of intel documents in 2020 that were held up by a corrupt liar, Rep. Adam Schiff, shows incredible information that destroys the Deep State’s many lies.
The biggest lie that the Russia collusion sham was based on was the tale that Russia hacked the DNC and then gave the hacked emails to WikiLeaks, who in turn released them before the 2016 election.
The whole story was a lie!
Crowdstrike had no evidence this ever took place.
Crowdstrike was hired by the DNC in April 2016 to investigate an alleged breach into the DNC servers.
They never had any evidence that the DNC was hacked.
Reporter Aaron Mate on Twitter identified the news first:
Mueller stuck in the word “appear”when suggesting Crowdstrike determined Russia stole DNC emails in the Mueller report:
On March 8, 2020 and before on June 16, 2019, we presented arguments against the Mueller gang’s assertion that Russians hacked the DNC.
Cyber expert Yaacov Apelbaum posted an incredible report with information basically proving that the Russians did not hack the DNC.
Apelbaum’s first argument is this –
According to the WaPo (using CrowdStrike, DOJ, and their other usual hush-hush government sources in the know), the attack was perpetrated by a Russian unit lead by Lieutenant Captain Nikolay Kozachek who allegedly crafted a malware called X-Agent and used it to get into the network and install keystroke loggers on several PCs. This allowed them to see what the employees were typing and take screenshots of the employees’ computer.
This is pretty detailed information, but if this was the case, then how did the DOJ learn all of these ‘details’ and use them in the indictments without the FBI ever forensically evaluating the DNC/HRC computers? And since when does the DOJ, an organization that only speaks the language of indictments use hearsay and 3rd parties like the British national Matt Tait (a former GCHQ collector and a connoisseur of all things related to Russian collusion), CrowdStrike, or any other evidence lacking chain of custody certification as a primary source for prosecution?
A second point by Apelbaum was –
… that three of the Russian GRU officers on the DOJ wanted list were allegedly working concurrently on multiple non-related projects like interfering with the 2016 United States elections (both HRC and DNC) while at the same time they were also allegedly hacking anti-doping agencies (Images 2-3).
Above are pictures of the individuals the FBI says were working on both the DNC/HRC email hacking and the Olympic doping projects.
The same guys were working on both projects which is all but impossible. (Do we really know if they’re even Russians?)
The fact that the three had multiple concurrent high impact and high visibility project assignments is odd because this is not how typical offensive cyber intelligence teams operate. These units tend to be compartmentalized, they are assigned to a specific mission, and the taskforce stays together for the entire duration of the project.
Next Apelbaum questioned the Mueller gang’s assertion that the ‘hacker’ named Guccifer 2.0 was a Russian –
Any evidence that Guccifer 2.0 is Russian should be evaluated while keeping these points in mind:
